首页> 外文OA文献 >Validity and reproducibility of measures of oropharyngeal dysphagia in preschool children with cerebral palsy
【2h】

Validity and reproducibility of measures of oropharyngeal dysphagia in preschool children with cerebral palsy

机译:学龄前儿童脑瘫口咽吞咽困难的效度和可重复性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aim: The aim of the study was to determine the best measure to discriminate between those with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) and those without OPD, among young children with cerebral palsy (CP).Method: We carried out a cross-sectional population-based study involving 130 children with CP aged between 18 months and 36 months (mean 27.4mo; 81 males, 49 females) classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification Scale (GMFCS) as level I (n=57), II (n=15), III (n=23), IV (n=12), or V (n=23). Forty children with CP (mean 28.5mo; 21 males,19 females, eight for each GMFCS level) were included in the reproducibility sub-study, and 40 children with typical development (mean 26.2mo; 18 males, 22 females) were included in the validity sub-study. OPD was assessed using the Dysphagia Disorders Survey (DDS), Pre-Speech Assessment Scale (PSAS), and Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment (SOMA). We analysed reproducibility using inter- and intrarater agreement (percentage) and reliability (kappa values and intraclass correlation coefficients). Construct validity was assessed as concordance between measures (SOMA, DDS, and PSAS). In the absence of a criterion standard measure for OPD, prevalence was estimated using latent class variable analysis. Data from the children with typical development were used to propose modified OPD cut-points for discriminative validity.Results: All measures had strong agreement (>85%) for inter- and intrarater reliability. The SOMA had the best specificity (100.0%), but lacked sensitivity (53.0%), whereas the DDS and PSAS had high sensitivity (each 100.0%) but lacked specificity (47.1% and 70.6% respectively). OPD prevalence when calculated using the web-based estimation was 65.4%, which was similar to the estimate from the modified cut-points.Interpretation: Using the sample of children with typical development and modified cut-points, OPD prevalence was lower than estimates with standard scoring. We propose using these modified cut-points when administering the DDS, PSAS or SOMA in young children with CP.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定区分脑瘫(CP)患儿口咽部吞咽困难(OPD)和无OPD的最佳方法。方法:我们采用基于人群的横断面研究涉及130名年龄在18个月至36个月之间的CP儿童(平均27.4mo; 81位男性,49位女性),根据总运动功能分类量表(GMFCS)分为I级(n = 57),II级(n = 15 ),III(n = 23),IV(n = 12)或V(n = 23)。可重复性子研究包括40名CP儿童(平均28.5mo;男21名,女性19名,每个GMFCS水平为8名),并包括40名典型发育儿童(平均26.2mo;男18名,女性22名)。有效性子研究。 OPD使用吞咽障碍调查(DDS),语音前评估量表(PSAS)和口腔运动评估时间表(SOMA)进行评估。我们使用评估者之间和评估者之间的一致性(百分比)和可靠性(kappa值和类内相关系数)分析了可重复性。根据措施(SOMA,DDS和PSAS)之间的一致性来评估构建体有效性。在没有针对OPD的标准标准措施的情况下,使用潜在类别变量分析估算患病率。来自典型发育儿童的数据被用来提出修正的OPD临界点,以提高判别效度。结果:所有指标在评估者间和评估者间的信度均具有很强的一致性(> 85%)。 SOMA的特异性最高(100.0%),但缺乏敏感性(53.0%),而DDS和PSAS的敏感性高(各为100.0%),但缺乏特异性(分别为47.1%和70.6%)。使用基于网络的估计数计算出的OPD患病率为65.4%,与根据修正的临界点得出的估计值相似。标准评分。我们建议在患有CP的幼儿中使用DDS,PSAS或SOMA时,使用这些修改的临界点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号